Evaluation of a Written Thesis. Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report form for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or ‘not passed’. For Master's students, this evaluation determines whether or not the thesis is ready for final submission, even if minor changes are recommended INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF A MASTER’S THESIS1 Evaluation is based on the final content of the thesis. If the supervisor has significantly assisted the author re-garding some parts of the thesis, one point can be subtracted from the total. This applies to items 3, 4, 6, 9 and The evaluation criteria below are guidelines, and should be applied with individual consideration. 1 The master’s thesis is a carefully argued scholarly paper of approximately 12, – 13, words (roughly 50 pages). It should present an original argument that is carefully documented from primary and/or secondary sources. The thesis must have a substantial research component and a focus that falls within arts and science, and it must be written under the guidance of an blogger.com Size: 99KB
Assessment Criteria for Master's Theses | Faculty of Education
The general assessment criteria cover the following issues:. The theoretical background is quite narrow, evaluating a master thesis, one-sided and unstructured.
There is a lot to remark on the thesis on all levels, with deficiencies and obvious errors. The presentation of the research results is superficial, evaluating a master thesis, summarizing and enumerative.
The discussion does not reach the level of independent interpretation. The whole is rather weak and unfinished. The theoretical background is loosely connected with the research problems, and the use of empiry is mechanical and deficient. There is a lot of good in the thesis, but also major shortcomings. The use of research methods is formalistic and unstructured. There are errors in the analysis, and the language and form of the thesis also have major flaws.
Although discussion as a whole is quite scanty, it does include pointers to possible applications. The data has been processed well and almost faultlessly. There can be some uncertainty in some central part of the thesis. The results are clearly consistent with the goals set for the study. The language and form of the thesis is good and consistent.
The results have been interpreted consistently and at a evaluating a master thesis quality. The student is in control of scientific publication practices, appearance and language of the thesis and ethical discussion. The thesis is very clear in structure and shows a highly advanced knowledge of the discipline of science. The theoretical background is meritorious and diversified and has a high quality. The connection between theory and empiry is very strong.
The methodological analyses have a high quality, they are independent and well justified. The use of sources is selective, plentiful and critical.
The concepts have been defined well, and they have been used correctly and clearly. The research data matches the study purposes. The data has been well classified and analyzed, creatively and without any faults. The main results have been gathered exceptionally well, and they have been assessed critically. Evaluating a master thesis thesis shows an independent grasp and it follows good scientific practices.
The thesis includes lots of new observations. As a whole, the thesis is stylistically excellent and consistent. Skip to main content. Close search. Faculty of Education. Admissions Evaluating a master thesis programmes Application Master's programmes and other special admissions Studying Education Programmes Education Primary Teacher Education Music Education Early Childhood Education Edglo - Master's Degree programme in Education and Globalisation Subject Teacher Education Special Education Studies Study guide Timetables Examinations Recognition of Prior Learning RPL Practices Intercultural Teacher Education Theses Graduation Minor subject studies Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit LET Women's and Gender Studies Sociology and Environmental Education Summer Studies Forms Passive Register Doctoral Programme Faculty Activities Organisation structure Faculty Board Management Group Education Committee Equality.
Assessment Criteria for Master's Theses.
Analysis Chapter in a Master Dissertation
, time: 8:20
A Master’s thesis that has been given a pass is assessed on a scale from 1 to 5: 1=sufficient (approbatur, lubenter approbatur) The theoretical background is quite narrow, one-sided and unstructured. There is a lot to remark on the thesis on all levels, with deficiencies and obvious errors INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF A MASTER’S THESIS1 Evaluation is based on the final content of the thesis. If the supervisor has significantly assisted the author re-garding some parts of the thesis, one point can be subtracted from the total. This applies to items 3, 4, 6, 9 and The evaluation criteria below are guidelines, and should be applied with individual consideration. 1 Evaluation of a Written Thesis. Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report form for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or ‘not passed’. For Master's students, this evaluation determines whether or not the thesis is ready for final submission, even if minor changes are recommended
No comments:
Post a Comment